Disagreement

[Kyir]

http://img226.echo.cx/img226/8020/untitled2copy4af.jpg

is that a turtle?, i played somone who had it and he insited it was

[KBHoleN1]

umm, i assume that is your turtle in the top left, and that is a very one-sided bomb in the lower left

no way that the bottom side is a turtle, it doesn't even preted to with a stone golem, that's just stupid

[Kyir]

really, this is why Terp's clan is full of world class n00bs

[Moose]

If your talking about the burn form then yes, it technically is a turtle form. The reason being is that the first developed turtle had units in a square/defensive position. The stone golem doesn't need to be in the form to make it a turtle, although if you wanted an "up to date" game, you should have asked for no ambusher or no burn units.


P.S: no the wisp isn't a burn unit, it's a poison unit :P

[Kyir]

i did ask for a up to date game

[Moose]

i did ask for a up to date game

Did u specifically ask for no burn units?

[DARKSMILE]

Did u specifically ask for no burn units?
lol, ure funny

[Wayfaerer]

Roasted turtle :cool:

[sub the hendrix]

BBQ tutle, with hotsauce.

Having a corner form does not a turtle make. Thats a bomb Kyir.

[Kyir]

which is what i told him, i left anyway, i wonder how he got to 1422 :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[zzzaacckk]

ya... that is clearly nowhere close to the average deffinition of a turtle.

[Cavour]

That thing doesn't even have a shell! :eek:

[ent__89]

I have a turtle that uses similar units, except i dont have any "burn units" further forward than the 3rd line(from the back), the only thing up front is a LW. Also mine includes a stone golem, this one doesnt, and the pyros, and especially the witch, up front are meant for an all out assault, in no way would even i call that a turtle.....