PDA

View Full Version : Assistance With Sig Needed


Deck of Jesters
10-21-2005, 09:44 PM
As you can see, all of my favorite reps are in my sig (and some that were put in by request), and I am now running short on space. If someone knows how to do animation so as to drop reps over one another, or fade the sig between 2 different images (continuous loop on both), I'll offer my measley rep and (the better reward) your name at the bottom of the sig. Thanks.

Lone2Wolf
10-21-2005, 09:52 PM
First off, do you have ImageReady?

If you do, then I THINK, that you

1. Open it on ImageReady
2. Get your second banner copied (Copied as in Copy + Paste, but just copy for now)
3. Duplicate frame
4. On 2nd frame, set opactiy to 0%
5. Tween somewhere around 20 - 40 frames
6. Duplicate frame
7. Paste 2nd banner on top of 1st
8. See step 5
9. Done?

This is only a guess.

ironhorse123
10-22-2005, 07:37 AM
If you can give me the images I will do it... :cool:

Lone2Wolf
10-22-2005, 10:59 AM
4. On 2nd frame, set opactiy to 0%
5. Tween somewhere around 20 - 40 frames

Oh wait, that just makes it fade out. :p
Go to SDI and request one.

Matt 34.5
10-22-2005, 11:07 AM
open your siggy into Imageready.

New frame
Paste new siggy
tween back about 5 frames from the second frame
now on the last frame there, tween to first frame, about 5 times.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 12:06 PM
There is a thread made for stuff like this already.

Snarr
10-22-2005, 12:17 PM
True dat, but that's a more specific question.
I'd love to know too btw.

Sodamoeba
10-22-2005, 12:21 PM
Yay! now my name wont be typed

~
S
o
d
a

in the siggy!:)

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 01:58 PM
Uhm, Volcom, you are obviously either stupid or just plain ignorant. I do not wish to ask other people specifically to make my banner, because I'll just be put on a list, and the odds of it getting completed are slim/none. If I make this post, only people who have the time to dedicate themselves to finishing the task will respond. Go neg someone who deserves it.

I'll send you the images Iron soon as I finish them, thanks.

Volcom
10-22-2005, 02:12 PM
your original post ..
As you can see, all of my favorite reps are in my sig (and some that were put in by request), and I am now running short on space. If someone knows how to do animation so as to drop reps over one another, or fade the sig between 2 different images (continuous loop on both), I'll offer my measley rep and (the better reward) your name at the bottom of the sig. Thanks.
my reply was ... theres a hole topic on banners
here (http://www.tacticsarena.com/forum/showthread.php?p=570107#post570107)
this is a much more suited place for you request..
not a new topic..

Uhm, Volcom, you are obviously either stupid or just plain ignorant. I do not wish to ask other people specifically to make my banner,
right.... but
I'll send you the images Iron soon as I finish them, thanks.
your getting him to make you a banner...
which is why this should be in the Banner request thread..

:dry:

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 02:13 PM
Uhm, Volcom, you are obviously either stupid or just plain ignorant. I do not wish to ask other people specifically to make my banner, because I'll just be put on a list, and the odds of it getting completed are slim/none. If I make this post, only people who have the time to dedicate themselves to finishing the task will respond. Go neg someone who deserves it.

I'll send you the images Iron soon as I finish them, thanks.
Rule #1: Don't insult others while asking for help.
Rule #2: There is a thread for this, and although the mods don't seem to care, you could have posted in that thread.
Rule #3: Google. GOOGLE!!

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 02:19 PM
Or, rather than put my request in the thread that is already longer than 6 pages long, I could make a single post that will die out if left alone and not negged by people who don't realize that my request will be processed 8 times faster if I make the new thread. Which would have died if you hadn't spent the time to do such a stupid neg. Time is valuable, and I have no desire to waste it waiting and waiting for a select few people to get around to designing it.

And dirka:

Rule #1: Don't neg people who are trying to be efficient. That other thread is jammed full, well beyond 6 pages, and I have no desire to wait for someone to get around to me.

Rule #2: See Rule #1.

Rule #3: My parents would go psycho if I were to download a program. I don't care how many people endorse it.

Rule #4: If someone has no intention of helping me, and instead, neg me, I'm going to flame them for the incredible amount of stupidity displayed. It's a simple thread, with a simple purpose. It is at least twice as efficient as getting slipped onto a list to wait, and wait, and wait, and wait, and wait, and wait, and... etc.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 02:25 PM
Or, rather than put my request in the thread that is already longer than 6 pages long, I could make a single post that will die out if left alone and not negged by people who don't realize that my request will be processed 8 times faster if I make the new thread. Which would have died if you hadn't spent the time to do such a stupid neg. Time is valuable, and I have no desire to waste it waiting and waiting for a select few people to get around to designing it.
What makes you special? You can lick me, now I'm gonna neg you.

And dirka:

Rule #1: Don't neg people who are trying to be efficient. That other thread is jammed full, well beyond 6 pages, and I have no desire to wait for someone to get around to me.

Rule #2: See Rule #1.

Rule #3: My parents would go psycho if I were to download a program. I don't care how many people endorse it.

Rule #4: If someone has no intention of helping me, and instead, neg me, I'm going to flame them for the incredible amount of stupidity displayed. It's a simple thread, with a simple purpose. It is at least twice as efficient as getting slipped onto a list to wait, and wait, and wait, and wait, and wait, and wait, and... etc.

.. It has nothing to do with a program. GOOGLE IDIOT!

This thread is pointless. I am going to neg you. Simply because you ask for help, then pretend to be God.

Jeffery
10-22-2005, 02:29 PM
So, basically, Deck of Dumbasses has declared that he doesn;t have to use the same method of every other forum member for requesting help with banners.

Banners- Revelations is there for requesting banners. You acted like an idiot, and got negged. You acted like an ass, and got negged. You continued acting like an ass, and got negged again.

You see a pattern between YOUR behavior and the negs you recieve?

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 02:35 PM
Well now, let's see how flawed your concept is:

1. I don't want to MAKE banners, I do not have the programming and I am not allowed to download the software to do so.

2. Everyone else can go ahead and use the Banner thread, I do not see a rule ANYWHERE that says if you have a banner to be made, post it here. I am not being "above" anybody, I am being smarter than them.

3. You still don't get the concept of HE DIDN'T OFFER TO HELP ME. Instead, he pointed out that there is a thread where a bunch of people ask a very limited number of other people to make banners. Not a particularly brilliant idea, as while they are still beating their heads on a wall waiting for a banner, I have a person who has agreed to make one for me.

Hey! What do you know. I'm still not proven incorrect.

~DoJ

P.S. I would have had your arguments up top, but character limits and all that. I'm sure I made my point, either way.
He sent a PM replying to my PM about his neg, anyway, I have proven every single one of his arguments incorrect in this PM, along with dirka's and Volcom's.

Basically, all the dumbasses who are still trying to prove me wrong are, so far, incorrect. I am not trying to be "above" everyone, I am being smarter.

Banners- Revelations is there for requesting banners. You acted like an idiot, and got negged. You acted like an ass, and got negged. You continued acting like an ass, and got negged again.

You see a pattern between YOUR behavior and the negs you recieve?
And my post is here for requesting a banner. As stated above, there is no rule stating I have to use that thread. The only pattern I see is a pattern of dumbasses negging me for proving them incorrect, over and over.

Edit: Also, dirka, what about Google? Is Google going to make a banner for me? If so, I am unfamiliar with this service. If not, the only other purpose would be to search for banner making software, which as I already said, I cannot download.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 02:36 PM
It has NOTHING to do with who is right and who is wrong. Nobody cared that there is another thread for this, and you wanted specific help. Then you were an ass. Therefore we started to care, and you got negged.

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 02:38 PM
I was an ass because someone was an idiot. Obviously, it does me no good to neg anybody around here, because they all have about 9 boxes. So instead, I just publically prove you all incorrect, laugh as you actually think my rating matters to me, and then laugh again as you argue more and more stupid points that I prove wrong, again and again.

Care to try again?

Jeffery
10-22-2005, 02:40 PM
Except that you still haven't disproven how you are a dumbass who got the negs he deserved.

You knew the Banners thread was for making banners, but felt you were too special to use it. You deserved your own thread because you are more important than ALL the other persons who use the proper thread to ask for banners.
You got negged for making your thread, and whined about it like a baby.
You got negged again, and started outright bawling about it.
You got negged for that, and started your full fledge tantrum.


Yup. You've proven a lot here today.

Fact: Deck of Dumbasses lives up to his name.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 02:41 PM
I was an ass because someone was an idiot.
Atleast you admit you're an ass, although the cause is off, its good enough.

Obviously, it does me no good to neg anybody around here, because they all have about 9 boxes. So instead, I just publically prove you all incorrect, laugh as you actually think my rating matters to me, and then laugh again as you argue more and more stupid points that I prove wrong, again and again.
Here is the thing. You publically proved nobody incorrect. You in fact said you proved something in a PM, and no PM doesn't mean Public Message. I still doubt this, but never the less, you admit you're an ass.

Care to try again?
Why would I do that? You realized and admitted you're an ass.

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 02:53 PM
Except that you still haven't disproven how you are a dumbass who got the negs he deserved.

You knew the Banners thread was for making banners, but felt you were too special to use it. You deserved your own thread because you are more important than ALL the other persons who use the proper thread to ask for banners.
You got negged for making your thread, and whined about it like a baby.
You got negged again, and started outright bawling about it.
You got negged for that, and started your full fledge tantrum.


Yup. You've proven a lot here today.

Fact: Deck of Dumbasses lives up to his name.
Sigh... repetition is, obviously, the only way to get you to figure this out, so, again, I shall prove first you, then dirka, incorrect.

I knew the Banners thread was for making banners. I knew that everyone and their brother uses it. I also knew there is no rule stating that I HAVE to use that thread. Therefore, I decided to go the smart route and make a request where only people interested in making my sig would post. Well, them and you and dirka.

I don't consider that whining. I consider it a method of proving someone is not only incorrect, but a moron at the same time.

You negged me, and I sent you a PM (and yes, dirka, I am aware that PM stands for Private Message). You sent me a PM with many flawed arguments, and I sent you another one with an argument proving you incorrect (multiple times), and decided it would do well to be put here to show how everyone else is incorrect.

Ah, the third neg, once again, see neg #1. It's not a tantrum, it's a method of proving you all to be idiots who still can't accept the fact you are WRONG.

Fact: Jeffery still has no clue what he's talking about.

And now, on to dirka. It's a shame, I thought you were one of the few intelligent people around here when that argument in CAU sprung up. Ah well.

Atleast you admit you're an ass, although the cause is off, its good enough.

Here is the thing. You publically proved nobody incorrect. You in fact said you proved something in a PM, and no PM doesn't mean Public Message. I still doubt this, but never the less, you admit you're an ass.

Why would I do that? You realized and admitted you're an ass.
lol, the old "You've admitted you're an ass, so you have admitted you are wrong." To the contrary, I admitted I'm an ass because I have the balls to admit what I am and why I'm so, compared to everyone else around here who can't seem to admit they are incredibly stupid.

I have now proven Jeffery, Volcom, and yourself incorrect, and you have all still refused to counter my arguments in a satisfactory way. That means I have proven you incorrect AND that you still cannot admit it.

And you would do that because, again, you are still incorrect. Need I go through it again, or is the 4th time enough for y'all?

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 02:55 PM
lol, the old "You've admitted you're an ass, so you have admitted you are wrong." To the contrary, I admitted I'm an ass because I have the balls to admit what I am and why I'm so, compared to everyone else around here who can't seem to admit they are incredibly stupid.
Se you're an ass and incredibly stupid. Got ya.

I have now proven Jeffery, Volcom, and yourself incorrect, and you have all still refused to counter my arguments in a satisfactory way. That means I have proven you incorrect AND that you still cannot admit it.
No. No you have not. <- Now see how just saying something has no real bearing.

And you would do that because, again, you are still incorrect. Need I go through it again, or is the 4th time enough for y'all?
I really don't think you get this. This is not an argument. You are an idiot and an ass. You had admitted to most of this already. You can lick me.

Jeffery
10-22-2005, 03:00 PM
You've proven me incorrect how?

You're still whining because you got negged fopr being a dumbass.

You're making long repetative posts (yes, you're being repetative also) stating that only you are right. When you were wrong to begin with, and have been wrong this entire thread.

There is no RULE stating you must use the banners revelation. There is a guideline that all banner requests go through the banner thread. The creator, who is a mod, states that "If I see a banner thread in General Discussion I will merge it with this one. Feel free to ask for an opinion about your banner here rather than making a new thread. If it's an avatar you need, again feel free to use this thread."

Now, anyone who is capable of reading and understanding English, and doesn;t think they are better than the rest of the board, understands that means banner requests go there.

You admitted you knew the thread was there, and that your request should go there, but that you couldn;t be bothered to use the same guidelines as "everyone and their brother".

So, you think you're better than the rest of the forums. Which is obviously yet another point where you are wrong.


You're a dumbass kid. And everyone in thbis thread has seen it.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 03:03 PM
In fact, sir raymen89@hotmail.com, I hope you like being mail bombed.

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 03:06 PM
dirka, where you are saying "no," without facts, I am supporting my argument with a clear, logical, and concise argument.

Jeffery:
There is no RULE stating you must use the banners revelation. There is a guideline that all banner requests go through the banner thread. The creator, who is a mod, states that "If I see a banner thread in General Discussion I will merge it with this one. Feel free to ask for an opinion about your banner here rather than making a new thread. If it's an avatar you need, again feel free to use this thread."
If he feels like merging this thread with his, good for him. It does not mean I have to post there, it doesn't even say "If you have a banner request, all other threads made for it will be negged because all requests must be made here." The only thing I see in your selection that even REFERS to banners is the "Feel free to ask for an opinion about your banner here rather than making a new thread." I don't see anything about requesting for banners in that entire quote.

Sorry that y'all can't admit that you have no logical explanation for your arguments. Too bad.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 03:10 PM
dirka, where you are saying "no," without facts, I am supporting my argument with a clear, logical, and concise argument.

That is exactly what I wanted you to say. Hand in hand, this is what you are doing. Saying something that means nothing, and then saying I have proved you wrong. See your mistakes now? Good.

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 03:15 PM
lol, I disagree. Where you are saying nothing, and then using nothing to back up what you say, I am saying something, and then using the evidence to prove my argument. As far as mail bombing, there is a junk filter that I can set to friends only, so bomb away.

Jeffery
10-22-2005, 03:17 PM
What evidence have you given to back up anything?

You admitted you knew that you should ahve post this in the Banners thread, and admitted that you don;t care what the forum standards are, as long as you get what you want, doing things the way the forum ettiquette has shown to do it doesn't matter.

You've admitted you think you are better than the rest of the forums. You've admitted you're an ass.

In fact, the ONLY evidence you've given so far proves you are a dumbass.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 03:19 PM
lol, I disagree. Where you are saying nothing, and then using nothing to back up what you say, I am saying something, and then using the evidence to prove my argument. As far as mail bombing, there is a junk filter that I can set to friends only, so bomb away.
You confuse something with garbage, which is inherently nothing to anybody but a fool. As far as mail bombing, it will be from one of your friends ;-)

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 03:27 PM
What evidence have you given to back up anything?

You admitted you knew that you should ahve post this in the Banners thread, and admitted that you don;t care what the forum standards are, as long as you get what you want, doing things the way the forum ettiquette has shown to do it doesn't matter.

You've admitted you think you are better than the rest of the forums. You've admitted you're an ass.

In fact, the ONLY evidence you've given so far proves you are a dumbass.
Well, amongst the incredibly wrong arguments in this post, I would like to post the most obvious one first:

"You've admitted you think you are better than the rest of the forums."

WRONG again. I have not admitted a single time that I am better than everyone else, although if you keep saying so, it might be true after all. What I did say is that I am being SMARTER than the rest of the forums.

Now, on to the rest of your mindless drivel:

I did not admit that it should have been posted in the banners thread. I admitted it could have been posted in the banners thread, but I never said it should be posted in the banners thread. Wrong statement #2 (of this post, that is).

I never said I don't care what the forum's standards are, as a matter of fact, that hasn't even come up. What I don't care for is waiting in line while 10 sig makers queue up 40 people, and then wait while they get through it all. Been there, done that, decided there is a more efficient method to the madness. Wrong point #3.

Ah, etiquette. How to prove you wrong here, when there are so many ways? Maybe I should start with the fact it is not RUDE to make a post involving a request for a sig maker to make me a banner. It may not be the most common method, it may go against the grain, but it is not RUDE. Rather, RUDE would be negging someone for all the wrong reasons. RUDE would be trying to prove me incorrect, getting your ass whipped by a logical argument, and then refusing to pay attention to the post and going back to the same argument. Wrong #4.

Hey! One right statement! I'm an ass. Whoop-dee-doo. Throw a party for Jeffery, he might be coming out of his basement for the first time in 30 years!

Jeffery
10-22-2005, 03:34 PM
Rofl. Another long thread proving you are a dumbass. Congrats.

Your own posts, where you say you don;t care what the forum standards are, and that you will not be held to the same standards as "everyone and their brother" is all the proof needed that you think you're better than everyone else.

Your REPETED statements that you knew of the Banners thread, but was too good to use it is proof of how stupid you are. No where in the thread did you notice a method of getting banners is to PM the makers, and ask them to make you one?

All you've, AGAIN, proven here is that you are a dumbass. No doubt you will make another long post making an even bigger dumbass of yourself, which is something you are encouraged to do. Watching you get even stupider with every post is fun.

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 03:42 PM
Rofl. Another long thread proving you are a dumbass. Congrats.

Your own posts, where you say you don;t care what the forum standards are, and that you will not be held to the same standards as "everyone and their brother" is all the proof needed that you think you're better than everyone else.

Your REPETED statements that you knew of the Banners thread, but was too good to use it is proof of how stupid you are. No where in the thread did you notice a method of getting banners is to PM the makers, and ask them to make you one?

All you've, AGAIN, proven here is that you are a dumbass. No doubt you will make another long post making an even bigger dumbass of yourself, which is something you are encouraged to do. Watching you get even stupider with every post is fun.
Then your life must be getting quite dull, as there isn't much entertainment. Anyway, onto the long post proving how you are still wrong. Again. And, my guess, is again. And another time after that most likely, as I shall continue to prove your repetative arguments incorrect until you either A. figure out that they are, indeed, wrong or B. give up on trying to use the same arguments that I've already disproved.

1. If proving you a dumbass is proving myself a dumbass, then yes, I must agree with you.

2. Again, I have neither said I don't care for the standard, nor have I said I'm better than everyone else. Rather, I said I'm going to be smarter than the rest of you and not wait forever to get my sig. I think I already proved this wrong earlier? Oh yeah, wait, you won't give up on it.

3. Oh, wait, all I have to do is PM someone and my banner will be made instantly?! No way! Wait, no, that's not right... rather, I'll have to wait for them to log in, check their PM, get around to making it, send me the image, and THEN it'll be done. Sorry, my bad. I didn't realize you worked in the government, where efficiency is not a good thing.

Alrighty then, in your next post, could you please put a little number in front of your arguments? Make it to where it shows how often you intend to use the old ones over and over, that way I know how many more posts I'm going to have to repeat myself in. It's one of those efficiency things you wouldn't understand.

Edit: I have a call to make, might not be back for awhile to prove your repetition incorrect until then. Wouldn't want you to miss me while you wait for my pwning of you over and over.

Jeffery
10-22-2005, 04:17 PM
Fact 1) You're an idiot, and have proven it repeatedly
Fact 2) Your actions prove you think you are better than everyone else because you don;t think you should be held to the same standards as "everyone and their brother"
Fact 3) You're an idiot, and have proven it repeatedly.

ironhorse123
10-22-2005, 04:44 PM
Here it is Deck...

http://img465.imageshack.us/img465/1570/card2vz.gif

Volcom
10-22-2005, 05:40 PM
Here it is Deck...

http://img465.imageshack.us/img465/1570/card2vz.gif

LOL
the banner you requested
hahaha
AND
i dont think MY neg was unresanble
i think it went like this
"this is more suited in other threads like the one at the top of general discussion"
i wasnt offense, i was espression MY oppion and my right to negative rep you
as it shows my dislike for your post
if you ad a problem which you did, we could have avioded all this if you PM'ed me telling me of you problems.. or negged me back
~ telling me to take long walk of a short pier...
as for you being better than everyone.. and your insistance that your right..
LOL . get over yourself

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 07:12 PM
Fact 1) You're an idiot, and have proven it repeatedly
Fact 2) Your actions prove you think you are better than everyone else because you don;t think you should be held to the same standards as "everyone and their brother"
Fact 3) You're an idiot, and have proven it repeatedly.
Woo hoo, what an intelligent post by Jeffery. Basement mold must be getting to your brain if this is the best you can do.

1&3 make no sense at all. I have, repeatedly proven you incorrect, and that's the most you can come up with?

2 on the other hand at least has a point. An incorrect point, but none the less a point. I don't think I'm "better" than everyone else, I think I do things "smarter" than everyone else. If that makes me better in your opinion, then so be it. I have not said I'm better than anyone else here, and your arrogance is beginning to reek. The simple fact that you cannot admit the fact that, "Hey, what do you know, I've been pwned by this guy about 20 times now, maybe I should either A. give up or B. admit I'm wrong" shows this.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I believe I owe Volcom a pwning.

LOL
the banner you requested
hahaha
AND
i dont think MY neg was unresanble
i think it went like this
"this is more suited in other threads like the one at the top of general discussion"
i wasnt offense, i was espression MY oppion and my right to negative rep you
as it shows my dislike for your post
if you ad a problem which you did, we could have avioded all this if you PM'ed me telling me of you problems.. or negged me back
~ telling me to take long walk of a short pier...
as for you being better than everyone.. and your insistance that your right..
LOL . get over yourself
I think I'll take this one line at a time, so as to draw this out and pwn you piece by piece. Ought to do the trick nicely.

1. Ok, so it's a banner, and I requested one. Not quite what I was looking for, but it's not bad. Is it possible for you to just make it 2 screens, full size? If not, I'll plug it in beneath the one I'm currently using, just to annoy everyone who cares. Hell, if you make another one that just switches between 2 shots, I'll put both in. Anyway, back on topic, what's the point of that line again?

2-3. Pointless... more so than line 1.

4. You don't? Let me post your neg rep, since you obviously can't recall it:
there is a huge section on banners at the top of General disscussion LOOK FIRST. ~ volcom
Is it rude? Not particularly. Is it pointless? Yes. It doesn't have any substance to back it up, considering there is no rules posted ANYWHERE saying that I have to use that thread. If I can be more efficient this way, why waste time with that thread? Nobody has answered that yet.

5-7. See above for the real neg.

8-9. Ok? So what, you used your right to neg rep me. Would you like a cookie? It's my right to show why you are a moron in the thread you neg repped me in.

10-12. Ah, yes, PM or neg rep you. Great idea. You'd just ignore the PM (or be as bull headed as this, just not in public) or you'd recieve a "blue rep," not to mention it would be pretty noobish just to neg rep you back. Rather, I can do what I have done so far, and that is prove you to be an idiot in public. Jeffery and dirka dirka just happened to pick the wrong side to battle for, and got pwned in the process.

13-14. Sigh... you and Jeffery should hold a party, strictly for those who deserve to work in the modern media. After all, they take everyone's words and twist them to hell and back. You'd fit in great. I still haven't said I'm better than anyone. As far as insisting I'm correct, until you, Jeffery, dirka dirka, or anyone else for that matter, prove me incorrect beyond a reasonible doubt, I will not "get over myself."


Need any more pwnment, or is that enough for y'all?

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 07:15 PM
Its seriously pathetic that you think you are correct in this argument. Anybody with two eyes and a mouse can see that you're an idiot. I suggest suicide.

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 07:25 PM
Its seriously pathetic that you think you are correct in this argument. Anybody with two eyes and a mouse can see that you're an idiot. I suggest suicide.
Considering you three are the only three to have negged me so far, I seriously doubt that everyone thinks I'm wrong here. Actually, if anyone takes the time to read this entire argument without being biased to start, I believe they would notice that where I have not only argued my points, but backed them up with substance, and that you have, yet again, made a complete fool of yourself by making a general statement that fails to have a point, much less evidence. So, let's review:

dirka dirka is making posts without a point, so there cannot be any support.

Jeffery has been reduced to a sniveling mass who's only unarguable point is that I'm an idiot, and since that is obviously not true (I've successfully pwned him and the others every time), there will never be an arguable point.

Volcom is nothing more than a moron who is posting mostly gibberish, followed by some garbage, with a point or two stuck in there without any sort of support.


In a battle of the wits, I believe you all left your weapons at home. What's the phrase? Oh yeah:

"Never bring a sword to a gun fight."

Take these words to heart before you try to even consider arguing against me. Otherwise, I'll just pwn you over and over like I have you three.

Edit: Nvm Iron, it has all my reps in it :) I'll just put it in below this one, nice work on it.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 07:30 PM
God.. Why do you gotta post such long posts?

Considering you three are the only three to have negged me so far, I seriously doubt that everyone thinks I'm wrong here. Actually, if anyone takes the time to read this entire argument without being biased to start, I believe they would notice that where I have not only argued my points, but backed them up with substance, and that you have, yet again, made a complete fool of yourself by making a general statement that fails to have a point, much less evidence.
I hate to break it to you, but ask anybody. The amount of negs has nothing to do with who thinks you are wrong.

dirka dirka is making posts without a point, so there cannot be any support.
... the last one? There was a point. I suggest you commit suicide.

Jeffery has been reduced to a sniveling mass who's only unarguable point is that I'm an idiot, and since that is obviously not true (I've successfully pwned him and the others every time), there will never be an arguable point.
It is obviously true. You have not owned shit. Anyone with a brain can see this.

In a battle of the wits, I believe you all left your weapons at home. What's the phrase? Oh yeah:
In a battle of wits, you'd be unarmed, so instead we had a battle of words, and evidently you were still $5 short.

"Never bring a sword to a gun fight."
Why not? I'd figure if you had a sword and a gun at a gun fight, you'd be ahead.

Take these words to heart before you try to even consider arguing against me. Otherwise, I'll just pwn you over and over like I have you three.
You haven't owned shit. The fact that you say "pwn" which originated from AOL culture in '97 proves to me you are nothing but a noob.

Volcom
10-22-2005, 07:30 PM
Considering you three are the only three to have negged me so far, I seriously doubt that everyone thinks I'm wrong here. .
thats because everyone else is laughing at you for being such a drama queen..
get over it, you posted in the wrong place.. your rude and like to whine..

...

Deck of Jesters
10-22-2005, 07:39 PM
God.. Why do you gotta post such long posts?

I hate to break it to you, but ask anybody. The amount of negs has nothing to do with who thinks you are wrong.

... the last one? There was a point. I suggest you commit suicide.

It is obviously true. You have not owned shit. Anyone with a brain can see this.

In a battle of wits, you'd be unarmed, so instead we had a battle of words, and evidently you were still $5 short.

Why not? I'd figure if you had a sword and a gun at a gun fight, you'd be ahead.

You haven't owned shit. The fact that you say "pwn" which originated from AOL culture in '97 proves to me you are nothing but a noob.
I post such long posts because A. it annoys the shit out of you three and B. I have a lot of evidence to post to back up my arguments. It's a nifty tactic, you ought to try it.

Anyway... on to the mindless drivel you have posted.

If the amount of negs have nothing to do with it, maybe the fact nobody else has rushed in to aid you does? Nobody in their right minds would assist me, as you three would likely neg them to hell and back for it, so I'm not expecting any assistance. However, if I'm really disagreed with this much, perhaps you ought to check and see if someone else is helping the powerhouses out here? No?

Oh, my bad, I forgot your suggestion to commit suicide. That obviously has a valid point in this argument... if you have alzhiemers or something maybe...

First you agree with me ("It is obviously true" is posted immediately after my point of how I'm not an idiot), and then you proceed to tell me I haven't successfully fended everyone off? Contradictory, not to mention noobish.

I have outwitted you, Jeffery, and Volcom. So if I'm unarmed, that means you are in the negatives?

This is the only response I will give to your (pitiful) attempt at a joke: pathetic.

So not only are you getting pwned, but you are getting pwned by a noob who is using an outdated phrase? What a step up for you! Party in Jeffery's basement tonight baby!

Ah, and as to wrap this post up, until your posts have some actual substance to them, I see no use in proving you wrong in them over and over. Substance means you have to have an argument that is supported by excerpts from the text, and chopping up the quotes won't work as I'll find the originals, post them, and then laugh at you.

Edit: Ah, Volcom returns for another beating.

thats because everyone else is laughing at you for being such a drama queen..
get over it, you posted in the wrong place.. your rude and like to whine..

...
I don't hear any laughter. And it's drama king, thank you very much, I'm afraid that unlike you, I have all the necessary male body parts to constitute a male human being.

I will not get over it, because there is nothing to get over. You are the one who refuses to give up on the notion you are correct. As I have proven, I did not post in the wrong place. Rude? Probably. Did you deserve it? Yes. As to whining, I disagree, as with whining, there is no point and it is almost always incorrect.

dirka dirka
10-22-2005, 07:42 PM
I post such long posts because A. it annoys the shit out of you three and B. I have a lot of evidence to post to back up my arguments. It's a nifty tactic, you ought to try it.

It doesn't annoy me. You have shit to back shit up. Its a bullshit tactic.

If the amount of negs have nothing to do with it, maybe the fact nobody else has rushed in to aid you does? Nobody in their right minds would assist me, as you three would likely neg them to hell and back for it, so I'm not expecting any assistance. However, if I'm really disagreed with this much, perhaps you ought to check and see if someone else is helping the powerhouses out here? No?
Nobody needs to aid us. People know Jeffery can own you like he owns everyone else.

Oh, my bad, I forgot your suggestion to commit suicide. That obviously has a valid point in this argument... if you have alzhiemers or something maybe...
Who said anything about it being about this argument. Seriously, consider my suggestion.

First you agree with me ("It is obviously true" is posted immediately after my point of how I'm not an idiot), and then you proceed to tell me I haven't successfully fended everyone off? Contradictory, not to mention noobish.
... agree with who? Nono. Nope.

I have outwitted you, Jeffery, and Volcom. So if I'm unarmed, that means you are in the negatives?
In your mind, you may have. In reality, you have not.

So not only are you getting pwned, but you are getting pwned by a noob who is using an outdated phrase? What a step up for you! Party in Jeffery's basement tonight baby!
Once again. "pwn" proves you=nub.


Ah, and as to wrap this post up, until your posts have some actual substance to them, I see no use in proving you wrong in them over and over. Substance means you have to have an argument that is supported by excerpts from the text, and chopping up the quotes won't work as I'll find the originals, post them, and then laugh at you.
Substance? Lick me.