PDA

View Full Version : Cyclops


Chlamydia[StDS]
11-20-2005, 03:13 PM
Cyclops was a cursed race, only having one eye. They relied on Brute strength to get them through battles. Being a mythological race they gained unatural powers. Cyclops mostly weilded Clubs made my great tree trunks.

HP: 55
Power: 25
Armor: 15
Block: 40% Front 20% Side
Movement: 3
Range: Melee Range [Equal to a knights range and pattern].
Recovery: 2

Attacks with A Mighty Club smashing the enemy, breaking thier bones.

Special: Due to the Cyclops massive power it enables him to use the attack Thunder Clap. The cyclops hammers the ground with his mighty club causing a Thunder Clap.

Thunder Clap hits like a pyromancers attack but around the Cyclops.
U=Unit
X=Units damaged by attack
O=Extra Spaces

OOXOO
OXUXO
OOXOO

Hellblazer
11-20-2005, 03:16 PM
It's original, but sort of overpowered.

Forest_Archer
11-20-2005, 03:24 PM
Gee, thanks for using an awesome name for a stupid unit. You obviously didn't use any thought or creativity in this. Why make a stronger melee unit when it's Cyclops? Make it have a special ability or something.

Servant
11-20-2005, 04:10 PM
how is it original hell? it doesnt do anything but have bad side blocking.

Hellblazer
11-20-2005, 04:11 PM
how is it original hell? it doesnt do anything but have bad side blocking.
And what does that have to do with originality?
Anyway, all I meant is that's it's simple and it sucks.

Chlamydia[StDS]
11-20-2005, 04:52 PM
Well i wonder why a cyclops has bad Side blocking? Could it be the fact that he has 1 eye? or what?
And i was working on a special but i didnt want to over power it.

I have only been playing for a little more than a week and have only been doing forums for a few days.. Im sorry if im noob..im sure you all were your first week..

Guilded Dragon
11-20-2005, 04:54 PM
i like the name but too overpowered. but keep trying

Darth_Vader
11-20-2005, 05:55 PM
I don't know about everyone else, but to me it seems as if you have made a knight stronger. And, even if it may have only 1 eye, if the frontal blocking is 50%, the side blocking must be 25%. If you read the CAU rules, I'm pretty sure it was stated there, and sorry if I'm wrong.

Cuathon
11-20-2005, 05:58 PM
those are just guidlines DV. he came up with a fairly good reason. i dont see the originality here though.

Darth_Vader
11-20-2005, 06:03 PM
OK, thanks for correcting me. I was under the assumption that they were rules, and not just guidelines. So I apolagize to you. I do think that it is rich in creativity, saying it has a smaller amount of side blocking because of the 1 eye. I do not; however, think it is original in stats. It to me resembles a knight. But hey, I was wrong once, so I could be wrong again.

Cuathon
11-20-2005, 06:05 PM
it's far too weak. lower the recov or something.

Cross Punisher
11-20-2005, 06:06 PM
I don't think the fact that it only has 1 eye is a good enough reason for him to break the rule of Blocking - Percentage chance to completely Block front attacks. Most units cannot Block from behind, and Blocking chance is halved for side attacks.

Cuathon
11-20-2005, 06:09 PM
yeah i confused myself lol. the guidelines arent rules but the blocking is.