View Full Version : A very perilous suspicion.
insignifiGant
01-10-2006, 03:07 AM
OMGZ teh Ambusher is teh suck!
I'm not mocking anyone, I swear.
Beleated it ftw!
I love you 12
Nastalgia is bettah. Butter. Bettah!
It's the yogurt inside. It gives it flavor.
Sign da balow if you love Pixie Stix.
Hellblazer
01-10-2006, 06:30 AM
Uh.....is this supposed to make us stop complaining about the GA?
Office_Shredder
01-10-2006, 06:31 AM
Signed,
Office_Shredder
Go pixie sticks!
Cosmo88
01-10-2006, 07:42 AM
Cosmo88
I :wub: Pixie Sticks...
kegsworth
01-10-2006, 08:27 AM
kegsworth
Pixie stix are ok I guess....
Bottle
01-10-2006, 08:29 AM
Butter. Bettah!
But butter < cheese.
gryph89
01-10-2006, 08:32 AM
Signed,
Office_Shredder
Go pixie sticks!
Ditto. . .except in a different name. . .derf
KBHoleN1
01-10-2006, 09:06 AM
Yeah!!! Pixie Sticks!!!
CRATER
01-10-2006, 09:21 AM
I like to stick pixies ;)
Twelve
01-10-2006, 09:28 AM
OhmygoshI'mterriblyinsultedbythisthread!Mods,I demandthatthisthingbedeletedasitisaninsulttothehea dytopicthatIstarted!Waahthisisn'tfairhow canthishappenwhereisdarespecthowdareyouinsig!Downw ithyou!12
T3km4n
01-10-2006, 09:34 AM
OhmygoshI'mterriblyinsultedbythisthread!Mods,I demandthatthisthingbedeletedasitisaninsulttothehea dytopicthatIstarted!Waahthisisn'tfairhow canthishappenwhereisdarespecthowdareyouinsig!Downw ithyou!12
joo haxored teh spaecenbar!
Twelve
01-10-2006, 09:36 AM
Andjoocan'tspellt3km4nsoshutupb4itellonjoo!gotogra mmarschoolfoo!12
T3km4n
01-10-2006, 09:39 AM
Andjoocan'tspellt3km4nsoshutupb4itellonjoo!gotogra mmarschoolfoo!12
yuo no if i wantened 2 i culd bild a klan an destory NETJAKENS
Walrus
01-10-2006, 09:40 AM
margerine > butter
kknp
Twelve
01-10-2006, 09:41 AM
That'simpossiblebecuzmanypeepshavetriedandfellflat onthereface!Anyways,ijustnoticedthatifyoukeeptypin gwithoutaspeceitmakesaspaceforyouautomatically!
Alright, alright, alright...enough spamming by me.
12
gryph89
01-10-2006, 09:42 AM
OhmygoshI'mterriblyinsultedbythisthread!Mods,I demandthatthisthingbedeletedasitisaninsulttothehea dytopicthatIstarted!Waahthisisn'tfairhow canthishappenwhereisdarespecthowdareyouinsig!Downw ithyou!12
I actually sat there reading that for like 5 minutes. . .my head hurts now
MallaLubba
01-10-2006, 10:10 AM
PiXiE StIcKs. . .RoRzCkOrZ!!!!!!
Warcow
01-10-2006, 10:16 AM
Wait! Something is horribly, horribly wrong here!
Don't you all see!? This can't be Insig! They don't have Pixie sticks in Kenya!!! Since we all know Insig is "Only in Kenya" surely this is some rogue impostor here to tarnish poor Insig's good name! errr . . . Okay well tarnish his name anyway . . . Dig his hole a little deeper?
You know what, screw it, y4yz0rs! that lamer lion bit the dust! GO IMPOSTOR!!!
Xenon
01-10-2006, 10:20 AM
Cosmo88
I :wub: Pixie Sticks...
Exactly.
Xenon
Pixie sticks.
allstarGL
01-10-2006, 10:54 AM
Very very clever title
err GO PIXIE STICKS!
allstar...
1 cont belive joo rdoped too teh levle fo thsee nobos.
nobo!1!1wun1!1
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 11:24 AM
I have to agree. Saying things like:
What I write here is not up for debate. I'm wrong, but we are not going to debate this, and we are going to look at it like I am correct.
The ambusher sucks.
Sign here.
is just plain dumb.
If you want to know who agree's, you should alway want to know who does not and why.
insignifiGant
01-10-2006, 11:34 AM
I have to agree. Saying things like:
is just plain dumb.
If you want to know who agree's, you should alway want to know who does not and why.
What da hell is you is talking aboot?
Pixie Stix is teh win, beotch.
insignifiGant
01-10-2006, 11:36 AM
But butter < cheese.
But da cheese > all, so tell us somfin we dun knoe.
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 11:42 AM
What da hell is you is talking aboot?
Pixie Stix is teh win, beotch.
Pixie Stix are pure evil. They are addicting. After awhile, you snort them to get the same physical effects of oral dosing. THEY ARE EVIL!
Twelve
01-10-2006, 12:37 PM
I have to agree. Saying things like:
is just plain dumb.
If you want to know who agree's, you should alway want to know who does not and why.
Yeah, January 2006 join date...what I thought. If you were here longer, you would know that the GA debate is well scripted on these forums; there are plenty of places to debate it and I would join you in another thread. That was not the purpose of that thread....
...Nor the purpose of this one, fool! Now get silly!
12
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 12:41 PM
Yeah, January 2006 join date...what I thought. If you were here longer, you would know that the GA debate is well scripted on these forums; there are plenty of places to debate it and I would join you in another thread. That was not the purpose of that thread....
...Nor the purpose of this one, fool! Now get silly!
12
ROFL. Twelve, you just based your entire argument on a join date. I've been here longer than you. I know for a fact that it is not well scripted, because it comes down to a fact that it will not change. People thought the new furgon move would help out against it, they also thought the berserker would help out against it. The fact remains, it is only a flaw if you rush!! and rushing just plain sucks.
Twelve
01-10-2006, 12:45 PM
ROFL. Twelve, you just based your entire argument on a join date. I've been here longer than you. I know for a fact that it is not well scripted, because it comes down to a fact that it will not change. People thought the new furgon move would help out against it, they also thought the berserker would help out against it. The fact remains, it is only a flaw if you rush!! and rushing just plain sucks.
I knew you would say that. ;)
Then if you were truly here longer than I, then you would know that this thread isn't just an idea that came overnight; I've spoken to many people about it before hand and that's why some people signed instantly. Also, I didn't make the thread if I didn't receive tips from a certain "someone" telling me how to go about it to indeed make a "change".
12
insignifiGant
01-10-2006, 12:47 PM
I is in agree-ence.
Pixie Stix is bettah than teh hax.
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 12:56 PM
I knew you would say that. ;)
Then if you were truly here longer than I, then you would know that this thread isn't just an idea that came overnight; I've spoken to many people about it before hand and that's why some people signed instantly. Also, I didn't make the thread if I didn't receive tips from a certain "someone" telling me how to go about it to indeed make a "change".
12
I never said it was an idea that you came up with overnight. I know that it is an issue. It is as resolved as it will get, though. That thread will NOT get any admin/seed action because you said strictly that it is NOT up for debate. You are not willing to debate the issue in the thread that it needs to be debated in.
KBHoleN1
01-10-2006, 01:04 PM
I never said it was an idea that you came up with overnight. I know that it is an issue. It is as resolved as it will get, though. That thread will NOT get any admin/seed action because you said strictly that it is NOT up for debate. You are not willing to debate the issue in the thread that it needs to be debated in.
I believe 12's point was that the issue has been debated before to no end. He has decided the best course of action, with considerable advising from others, and is taking that action to raise the attention of Seed, who he will contact with the results of this thread (i.e. - the poll and the signatures). Debating the issues in this thread will only lead to bickering, which will cloud the issue, as has been done many times in the past, and once again nothing will get done.
Why do some people claim that nothing will help, so we should do nothing? You must try before you can affirm the uselessness of your actions.
Go get em' 12.
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 01:07 PM
I believe 12's point was that the issue has been debated before to no end. He has decided the best course of action, with considerable advising from others, and is taking that action to raise the attention of Seed, who he will contact with the results of this thread (i.e. - the poll and the signatures). Debating the issues in this thread will only lead to bickering, which will cloud the issue, as has been done many times in the past, and once again nothing will get done.
Why do some people claim that nothing will help, so we should do nothing? You must try before you can affirm the uselessness of your actions.
Go get em' 12.
The issue has not been debated in any great detail before, there is no issue to debate. Simply put. You guys can't adapt. How is that seed's problem?
I'm not claiming nothing will help. I'm claiming you guys refuse to do what will help, and inherently your actions are the useless actions.
Twelve
01-10-2006, 01:43 PM
I'm not claiming nothing will help. I'm claiming you guys refuse to do what will help, and inherently your actions are the useless actions.
Thanx KB. I had to attend a date right quick...
Now that I'm back...
We won't get into trying to find out who you are; you won't tell us and you're obviously someone significant. Perhaps even Seed. ;) I mean, why can you say this:
That thread will NOT get any admin/seed action because you said strictly that it is NOT up for debate.
Unless you have some kind of authority?
Anyways, the basic point is this, which I've said over and over:
The discussion regarding the GA has been had over and over. Type in "Golem Ambusher" on the search engine here and see them. I didn't want the thread to turn into something like that. Everybody knows the arguments by heart, both sides of the debate.
But I firmly believe that the majority of people who have played this game before the GA believe the game was better without it. If this was not the case, why not create a thread, Panda, that asks people about who thinks I am wrong? I believe you'll get support, but not from people who have been around long enough to know better.
I love this game and I just want it to be balanced again. We're trying to DO something now that the debate has been had.
12
MokoToko
01-10-2006, 01:45 PM
derkah derkah
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 01:55 PM
We won't get into trying to find out who you are; you won't tell us and you're obviously someone significant. Perhaps even Seed. ;) I mean, why can you say this:
That thread will NOT get any admin/seed action because you said strictly that it is NOT up for debate.
Unless you have some kind of authority?
Who I am is obvious, however not truly significant. I can say that because people are entitled to their opinion.
The discussion regarding the GA has been had over and over. Type in "Golem Ambusher" on the search engine here and see them. I didn't want the thread to turn into something like that. Everybody knows the arguments by heart, both sides of the debate.
You are wrong. Everybody knows the for and against sides of the debate. Few know the indifferent side of the debate, the ones that are willing to adapt even though it sets a challenge.
But I firmly believe that the majority of people who have played this game before the GA believe the game was better without it. If this was not the case, why not create a thread, Panda, that asks people about who thinks I am wrong? I believe you'll get support, but not from people who have been around long enough to know better.
I'm getting support through rep, people agree with me. They just don't want to speak out, because the point I am arguing goes against what most say.
I love this game and I just want it to be balanced again. We're trying to DO something now that the debate has been had.
12
The game is balanced. The debate has not been had.
banditto
01-10-2006, 01:58 PM
Ya Dirka is back!
Now the forums are less sucky. All we need is a little controversy...
Twelve
01-10-2006, 02:07 PM
Who I am is obvious, however not truly significant. I can say that because people are entitled to their opinion.
Much like the quiet masses who are giving you "support through rep", why duck and hide in shadows and new names if what you stand for is correct?
You are wrong. Everybody knows the for and against sides of the debate. Few know the indifferent side of the debate, the ones that are willing to adapt even though it sets a challenge.
That was my argument as well, if you had truly seen them, being here as long as you supposedly have been. And I have adapted...turtles used to at least provide a challenge and often a win against me, now they have no chance. Now people who use the stone golem can only use the stone golem against others who use it.
I'm getting support through rep, people agree with me. They just don't want to speak out, because the point I am arguing goes against what most say.
Heck, I'm getting support through rep too...big deal. If I saw that a large part of the experienced community publically DISAGREED with me, I would shut up. Get your boys and tell them to speak up. I challenge you.
The game is balanced. The debate has not been had.
Then maybe you have just seen these forums for the first time in January 06.
The stone golem is useless against 95% of opponents...and you call the game balanced. Just imagine if the game of CHESS had a new piece, and suddenly the knight was useless. Lol...it would very obviously no longer be a good game.
12
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 02:13 PM
Much like the quiet masses who are giving you "support through rep", why duck and hide in shadows and new names if what you stand for is correct?
I'm not at all hiding in the shadows. If I say it, thats insulting you. Trust me on this one.
That was my argument as well, if you had truly seen them, being here as long as you supposedly have been. And I have adapted...turtles used to at least provide a challenge and often a win against me, now they have no chance. Now people who use the stone golem can only use the stone golem against others who use it.
You are wrong. You do not consider extreme scenarios. You only consider what is there at face value.
Heck, I'm getting support through rep too...big deal. If I saw that a large part of the experienced community publically DISAGREED with me, I would shut up. Get your boys and tell them to speak up. I challenge you.
Its not that they agree or disagree. That is why they won't speak out. It is more that it is redundant and you are not considering the real problem.
Then maybe you have just seen these forums for the first time in January 06.
The first time on these forums for me was 12-19-2003.
The stone golem is useless against 95% of opponents...and you call the game balanced. Just imagine if the game of CHESS had a new piece, and suddenly the knight was useless. Lol...it would very obviously no longer be a good game.
12
Where did I call the game balanced? I NEVER called the game balanced. It is all about strategy. If you think a unit is useless, don't use it. If you think you can protect it from being useless, use it. You are making up statistics (95%). Although, I don't doubt that 95% of the people playing turtle can't play well. I know I've beat you.
Twelve
01-10-2006, 02:14 PM
derkah derkah
Oh wait, hold on...it just hit me...is this dude I'm talking to Dirka, you think?
*sigh*
Peace out. I had visions of actually talking to someone who could DO something...not Dirka, who argues for the sake of argument...
12
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 02:18 PM
Oh wait, hold on...it just hit me...is this dude I'm talking to Dirka, you think?
*sigh*
Peace out. I had visions of actually talking to someone who could DO something...not Dirka, who argues for the sake of argument...
12
and just like in the rap thread, you've been had and look for a way out. That was said long long ago, you didn't just see it now. If you have visions of someone who can do something, try not to look anywhere on these forums. Nobody can do anything about people's lack of skill.
Twelve
01-10-2006, 02:20 PM
The game is balanced. The debate has not been had.
and later
Where did I call the game balanced? I NEVER called the game balanced.
It IS Dirka!!! Only he contradicts his own words in such a way! Get back on my ignore list, fool!!! You had me going for awhile!
lol...
12
Panda Socks
01-10-2006, 02:22 PM
and later
It IS Dirka!!! Only he contradicts his own words in such a way! Get back on my ignore list, fool!!! You had me going for awhile!
lol...
12
You took me out of context. The game is balanced, as in my first quote. The second quote was refering to skill, as just you were refering to. Skill will always make the game unbalanced.
insignifiGant
01-10-2006, 02:33 PM
Yeap.
Pixie Stix fockin rox.
gryph89
01-10-2006, 02:40 PM
edit : this completly has no meaning whatsoever *starts dancing*
Bottle
01-10-2006, 03:00 PM
Can we please get back on topic, dirka?
Cheese > butter > marg, right?
Daemon Bloodmaw
01-10-2006, 04:54 PM
Man... Over 150 small pixie sticks, 26 jumbo sized pixie sticks, 5 8th grade boys, a basement, and an all nighter :cool:
I still think his parents restrict how many people my friend can have over his house at one time.
And seriously now, I knew it was dirka by his first post. Panda? C'mon.. Try harder than that :p
insignifiGant
01-10-2006, 05:09 PM
Can we please get back on topic, dirka?
Cheese > butter > marg, right?
You ar correck sah.
Give da man a pryze!
Northwind
01-10-2006, 05:21 PM
Actually, when I want to inject sugar straight into my veins, I prefer Nerds. Mmmmmm . . . rock candy with a sugar coating!
And cheese is delicious, but butter is more versatile and good in sooo many things. :)
Bottle
01-10-2006, 07:27 PM
You ar correck sah.
Give da man a pryze!
Woot, priz0rs!
savanna
01-10-2006, 08:04 PM
pixie sticks rock!
*gives pixie sticks to everyone except walrus*
hey loooks like i was one short.
=)
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.