A censorship issue

[bugreporter]

hello,
is it possible to make "niger" into a "####" censored word instead of an auto-boot? it's just not intuitive that saying "Nigeria" in a game should result in a boot. (though now I know about it :\)

[The Coder]

and what will you want next? s*x turned into a #### word so that people can't trick you into saying tacticsexpert? get over it. You live. You learn. A smart person doesn't do it.

[ReTodd]

hello,
is it possible to make "niger" into a "####" censored word instead of an auto-boot? it's just not intuitive that saying "Nigeria" in a game should result in a boot. (though now I know about it :\)
You are correct, but the answer is still no. If you fall for it a second time, I reccomend you wear a helmet. Now shut your candy ass up and beat the fool that needed to cheat to win. :)

[Meteor Rayne]

Go to legends if you want to swear without getting auto-booted. If not, Look at ReTodd's post above mine.

[Rating Director]

wait, on legends you don't get auto-booted? no wonder why there are more problems... *goes to legends*

[The Coder]

You are correct, but the answer is still no. If you fall for it a second time, I reccomend you wear a helmet. Now shut your candy ass up and beat the fool that needed to cheat to win. :)

falls under the catagory, fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me.

[bugreporter]

and what will you want next? s*x turned into a #### word so that people can't trick you into saying tacticsexpert? get over it. You live. You learn. A smart person doesn't do it.

A smart person doesn't post before thinking.



ReTodd: Ok. I didn't really think anybody would change anything, but I wanted to get the point across. The point is, "Niger" is an exception to the rule, and one that players can't deduce (ie. if "fuk" isn't censored, why isn't "Niger"? fill in the argument). The result is that, without external warning, any rational player can only learn the exception by first-hand experience. They shouldn't have to.

Of course I'll play on. Of course I won't "fall for it" again. I'm just pointing out that this is a little sloppiness on the part of the system.

[monkus]

It's really simple, just don't trust your opponent. Ever. Rare exception is if you're talking with a Moderator; they can always be trusted (identify them by their different colored text).
If you want to play with a "scamming" opponent, remember, a country that starts with N: Nicaragua. If they ask for an African country you're out of luck (Nicaragua's in Central America), but then again, chances are they have no idea where Nicaragua is. If they ask for ANOTHER, tell them to cut to the point and stop asking silly questions.
As for F5, just tell them you already pressed it and are thankful for the Dragon.

[Scorpionz]

Lmao!

Thats excellent Monk!

[Scorpionz]

Sorry I lagged.

[Megabyte]

A smart person doesn't post before thinking.



A smart person would ask how often your going to say Nigeria while playing TAO. As compared to how many times some idiot will say niger in game that is.


Really, how many times will someone fall for that trick? If you're dumb enough to do it more than once (not implying anything about anyone) I think you deserve what happens.

[***Duo***]

A smart person would ask how often your going to say Nigeria while playing TAO. As compared to how many times some idiot will say niger in game that is.


Really, how many times will someone fall for that trick?


Perhaps 4 times on a bad day?


-Duo

[Matt 34.5]

hello,
is it possible to make "niger" into a "####" censored word instead of an auto-boot? it's just not intuitive that saying "Nigeria" in a game should result in a boot. (though now I know about it :\)
People will dc once for that trick, and they'd be dcing while their still new. Seeing as how it takes a while to realy learn the game its not a huge loss if you dc yourself because you got tricked.

The real problem is that "shit" filter...

[bugreporter]

Okay! I think I've already said everything to beat this dead horse!


But just to be sure it's dead, the point is that no player should have to be booted once!

I assure you I say all sorts of random wacky shit inbetween moves and games just to pass the boredom, and to entertain myself and the other player(s)!

My internalized chat filter is impeccable! But since there is no list of bad words as far as I can tell, they have to be deduced! But exceptions can not be deduced, they can only be found out empirically! So wtf?


If "shit" was an auto-boot, at least it would be intuitive.

[|ReNeGaDe|]

Hah i just learned why Tacticsexpert is a boot word, lol. i never figured that out lol. Heh

[Megabyte]

My internalized chat filter is impeccable! But since there is no list of bad words as far as I can tell, they have to be deduced! But exceptions can not be deduced, they can only be found out empirically! So wtf?


If "shit" was an auto-boot, at least it would be intuitive.

Deduction isn't necessary. You don't need to know every word thats on the list.

A general common sense factor would be if you're not sure if a word is bootable, to not say it.


You seem really eager to press youself as bringing up an intelligent point and suggestion. But the reality is an intelligent person wouldn't have a problem with it in the first place, nor would they care.

So really, its a suggestion on how to make life easier for idiots. When we get down to it, I think we all agree we need to make it as life as hard for idiots as humanly possible, that way we weed them out of the social pool.

[mantis33]

Hah i just learned why Tacticsexpert is a boot word, lol. i never figured that out lol. Heh
*cough* noob *cough*

And monkus, your post made me laugh...on into the night...

[Madars]

I say we should just remove the censor completely,or make it like legends.I bet sergiy would get some extra dough..since more people will come to fps. :cool:

-Mad-

[bugreporter]

Megabyte: I understand where you're coming from, but you're wrong. Oh what the hell, let's point-by-point.

Deduction isn't necessary. You don't need to know every word thats on the list.

Contradiction. You either need to know the list or else you need to know the criteria for putting a word on the list.

If the criteria are arbitrary, and the list is hidden (unless there is one somewhere?), then a consequence is that you need to be d/ced once in order to finding out what's on the list (in other words, the only way to find out what's arbitrarily decided as "wrong" is to accidentally cross an arbitrary standard). This is stupid.

A general common sense factor would be if you're not sure if a word is bootable, to not say it.

So according to common sense, we should never speak in a game. This is close to the only other good point in this thread made by monkus, in "don't trust your opponent ever." But then I take issue with the idea that the purpose of the in-game chat is in part to affect the game. "Common sense" will tell you that use of the in-game chat as part of the game is a scam, not a tactic.

You seem really eager to press youself as bringing up an intelligent point and suggestion. But the reality is an intelligent person wouldn't have a problem with it in the first place, nor would they care.

Irrelevant. But for what it's worth, I only care that the point is valid. Which it is.

So really, its a suggestion on how to make life easier for idiots. When we get down to it, I think we all agree we need to make it as life as hard for idiots as humanly possible, that way we weed them out of the social pool.

Wrong, and no comment on your aspirations to Social Darwinism.

The suggestion is: either make the filter list consistent, or make the exceptions known.

The problem is not that people can be scammed, per se. The problem is that there exist certain buttons with no labels that you only find out that they lead to bad consequences once you have suffered those consequences.

You might reply, like monk and megabyte (in part) did, "well don't press buttons." But then, you might be a bloody Communist.

[ReTodd]

I was once booted from a game while discussing Led Zeppelin. My favorite song of their's is Moby Dick.

[Megabyte]

Contradiction. You either need to know the list or else you need to know the criteria for putting a word on the list.

If the criteria are arbitrary, and the list is hidden (unless there is one somewhere?), then a consequence is that you need to be d/ced once in order to finding out what's on the list (in other words, the only way to find out what's arbitrarily decided as "wrong" is to accidentally cross an arbitrary standard). This is stupid.

This ties in with common sense. Use proper sociable english that is widely accepted and aknowledged. If you need a clearer definition or more specific case example in order to understand what such things are, you'd be put into the "idiot" category.

I have no need to see a list, nor do I need to know what such criteria are. This is knowledge I believe anyone with a good 5'th grade education should have in order to be able to do this. If that is beyond some people...not my problem.


So according to common sense, we should never speak in a game. This is close to the only other good point in this thread made by monkus, in "don't trust your opponent ever." But then I take issue with the idea that the purpose of the in-game chat is in part to affect the game. "Common sense" will tell you that use of the in-game chat as part of the game is a scam, not a tactic.

Interesting interpretation for the use of common sense. However, as said above, I have no need to specifically know the entirety of the list in order to avoid using a word on it. If others are not capable of such a thing, I fully support them not speaking in the game in order for them to avoid getting the boot Its most likely I wouldn't care to read anything they had to say anyways.

But to my own point, you'd be mistaken. I can speak freely, about pretty much anything I'd care too, and not worry about setting off the filter. All with the use of common sense.

While I can agree that chat should not be considered a tactic in the game, should is an idealism and reality rarely works within our ideals.


Wrong, and no comment on your aspirations to Social Darwinism.
I was kinda hopin for a comment...but I'll work with what I get I suppose.


The suggestion is: either make the filter list consistent, or make the exceptions known.

In which case I should inform you that the filter IS consistant. You simply do not know what the consistancy is based around ;)

The concept of words which are filtered are racial slurs or insults. (Forgive me for spelling out a few those who are easily offended) Nigger, Bitch, Gay, faggot, and other such derivatives. Swear words as a whole are not filtered as that is more of a cultural stigma than an offense per se. Plus there was the issue with ass being filtered and one of the units being called an assassin...

[mushroom_girl]

Think about it this way: If you're really intelligent, you can find so many other ways to insult people than cursing. If you can't, shaddup.

If you're going to fall for the Nigeria or Tacticsexpert trick, cool. Fool you once, shame on them. Fool you twice, shame on you. You learn with experience. Like Mega said, if you're not sure if you'll get booted or not, then don't say it.

And if you cuss (breaking the TOS) then you deserve to be kicked, plain and simple. Just like you deserve to be edited when you cuss on the forums. You're not special, you're just whining because you lost a match to a cheater. Next time, you won't fall for it. Or you shouldn't anyway.

[The Coder]

Also, its not like your not thinking about cussing normally.
You think before you type
Its that impulsive

[bugreporter]

There are offensive words in this post. I apologize (?). If you do not like them, do not read further.


The concept of words which are filtered are racial slurs or insults. (Forgive me for spelling out a few those who are easily offended) Nigger, Bitch, Gay, faggot, and other such derivatives. Swear words as a whole are not filtered as that is more of a cultural stigma than an offense per se. Plus there was the issue with ass being filtered and one of the units being called an assassin...

Well now we're getting somewhere.

I don't think 'Niger' is a derivative of 'Nigger'. At the very least, it seems to me it's an interesting case. Incidentally, the reason I brought any of this up to the forums at all was that I thought it was an interesting case, and it's sad that a lot of these replies forego thinking about the issue entirely in favor of a smug idiom or (no offense) an appeal to common sense.


I've already wasted too much time posting "no, I'm not saying x, I'm not saying y, no I'm not saying z," so I'm going to try and refrain from endlessly renewing clarification. If you're not understanding the point, you're either not reading the thread, not thinking about the case, or just not trying to understand.

Furthermore, as I already stated, I didn't exactly expect a change, though I'm still not convinced it isn't worth it. The question that remains is:

Ideally, should the word "Niger" be an auto-boot censor?



So for one last attempt, let's try a fresh start: try to clear everything from your mind, and just consider a few ideas. Just consider them.



•"Niger" just is not a derivative of "Nigger." It's a country, and a river. However, in practice, it can and has been used to get across an epithet, perhaps in much the same way as people use "fuk" or "f@g" or "f a g" or what have you.


•unlike other auto-boot derivatives, "Niger" and "Nigeria" actually has a rats chance of being said on accident. Don't think about scams, but think about, say,

-the case of a rambling entertainer who drops "Nigeria" as part of a punchline ("You might as well order a space shuttle from Nigeria, LOL"), or

-the highly improbable but not inconceivable case of somebody actually from Niger or Nigeria playing TAO. (player1: a/s/l? || player2: 36/M/N--**BOOT**)

Bad joke attempts aside, the point is, it's not inconceivable that Nigeria would come up by accident.


•There are other ways to get across epithets as well. Heck, you can say "Stupid white fatso with buck teeth," and be free from an auto-boot (in fact, as everyone knows, there are a zillion ways to get around a filter).


•There aren't any other "epithet accidents" such as is the case with "Niger." "Spic' and Span" maybe? But that just doesn't seem like a comparable case. I can't really think of another (unless "cock" is an autoboot, in which case, Shuttlecock anyone?). It's not like "flag" can be used to convey "fag."




All right. If you read anything in this thread, read those four points, and just think over them for a while. That's all.

Once you've done that, then maybe you will see what motivated me to make the initial suggestion.

Let this be my contribution to the thread.

[The Coder]

dude, no offense, but give it up. If everyone disagrees with you, it may not be the best of ideas. your the only one fighting this battle. its you against the forums...
[subliminal message] Give into peer pressure [/subliminal message]

[Megabyte]

For reference Coder, thats idiotic reasoning. If all of you are idiots, you can disagree all you want and its still the opinion of a bunch of idiots. I kinda enjoy being contrary to the community's thoughts as a whole because its my belief that a very solid majority (90%+) ARE idiots.

My point is that the community as a whole's opinion is never an indictaion of good/bad/right/wrong. Its merely where a majority of the community stands. That so many of you are incapable of individual thought (which is my conclusion as to why so many of you agree so often without reason) is hardly an indication that contrary ideas are poorly thought out, or "wrong."


Well now we're getting somewhere.


Well, since you spoke in ideals and don't expect a change, I'll speak in realities :p

(This just means its late and I'm not willing to address all the above points. My agreement, or lack thereof, is not implied in my below statements as they are pointless.)

Nope, we've gotten where we need to be.

This is where I can return to the default reasoning. The reality is your thoughts do not define the filter, nor would a majority of people's thoughts (if by some miracle you could claim a majority in agreement with yourself).

The administrators are the sole ones who are able to determine such things. TAO is not, nor has it claimed to be, open for democratic thought and opinion.


I can tell you with certainty that the concept behind the filter is the above stated reasoning, as I've asked several members who are in positions to speak in authority (of course if any mods/admins feel need to correct me please do so).

It is the unfortunate end of debate on the topic. They are the ones who determine such things and as such its not open for discussion (aside from theoretical) be the community members such as ourselves.

At some point they decided that the amount of people trying to dodge the nigger word in the filter and using niger was enough to warrant its addition to the filter. We are not really in a position to disagree, is the unfortunate reality.

[Scorpionz]

•"Niger" just is not a derivative of "Nigger." It's a country, and a river. However, in practice, it can and has been used to get across an epithet, perhaps in much the same way as people use "fuk" or "f@g" or "f a g" or what have you.


•unlike other auto-boot derivatives, "Niger" and "Nigeria" actually has a rats chance of being said on accident. Don't think about scams, but think about, say,

-the case of a rambling entertainer who drops "Nigeria" as part of a punchline ("You might as well order a space shuttle from Nigeria, LOL"), or

-the highly improbable but not inconceivable case of somebody actually from Niger or Nigeria playing TAO. (player1: a/s/l? || player2: 36/M/N--**BOOT**)

Bad joke attempts aside, the point is, it's not inconceivable that Nigeria would come up by accident.


•There are other ways to get across epithets as well. Heck, you can say "Stupid white fatso with buck teeth," and be free from an auto-boot (in fact, as everyone knows, there are a zillion ways to get around a filter).




My Two Cents

You have practically based this whole debate on one stupid word.

There are a million ways around a filter, The TAO Administration have just removed one of the ways around it.

If you live in Niger just say you live in Africa thats enough. I wouldn't want to know exactly where they live.

("You might as well order a space shuttle from Nigeria, LOL")

Why not say "Kenya" instead of "Nigeria" Huh? Kenya is definately more funny out of the two.

Don't debate any further, If you fall for a scam just screen shot it and send it to a mod if your that obsessed.

Aye Karamba.

[Wolfman]

hehehe....

wolf got a good one:

there were a few times when some ppls keeping asking wolf how come wolf don talk even when he is winning? wolf got pretty annoyed n answered, "cuz i am typing in green color, can't u see it?" "Nope", said the ppl. Wolf said, "ahh, forget to tell ya... u got to press alt+F4 to see what i wrote, chk it out, wolf is giving u some hints on his next moves." he surrendered.

wolfy

[Scorpionz]

It took me 10 minutes to read that. No offence to you grammer.



I once had a guy,

I get the first move and I say to him "Press F5"

Next thing I see is "TheGuy has left the arena"

It was pretty funny.

[some1udontknow]

Just ignore them, or spell everything backwards, i garantee, if they can spell, the match will be a bit of chaos, and amusing.

[The Coder]

while we are talking about seeing others surrender from cheating oriented things...
Im whooping this guy (lets call him irockzorsattacticsarena)from a freshly created account. To give the impression that I am new, I use the default. So as a last ditch effort to win, he says, press f5 to get a free cleric. So I respond, You go first. and then this is what I see...

irockzorsattacticsarena: irockzorsattacticsarena has left the arena

you shoulda seen me laugh

[monkus]

People will dc once for that trick

I've fallen for it a total of 27 times so far, and still counting.

[silvermyst]

You are correct, but the answer is still no. If you fall for it a second time, I reccomend you wear a helmet. Now shut your candy ass up and beat the fool that needed to cheat to win. :)

Im sorry but thats funny!!:p wear a helmet hahahheheheh!

but it's true you can't block all the words and certain words are made to kick ya if you stop to think before you act you'll do just fine just use your head.
(thats that thing three feet from your ass):confused:

[Megabyte]

I've fallen for it a total of 27 times so far, and still counting.

you have a weakness for the term "candy dispenser," which I have abused in the last 26 matches between us

...sorry

[XpLiCiTReaLiTy]

It's really simple, just don't trust your opponent. Ever. Rare exception is if you're talking with a Moderator; they can always be trusted (identify them by their different colored text).
If you want to play with a "scamming" opponent, remember, a country that starts with N: Nicaragua. If they ask for an African country you're out of luck (Nicaragua's in Central America), but then again, chances are they have no idea where Nicaragua is. If they ask for ANOTHER, tell them to cut to the point and stop asking silly questions.
As for F5, just tell them you already pressed it and are thankful for the Dragon.

Really good hints there Monkus, the best one is still the F5 one. Priceless.

[The Coder]

If they ask for an African country you're out of luck (Nicaragua's in Central America)


monkus, an african country starting with n is namibia

[Jeffery]

You mean the african country that end in "igeria" then the answer is Trigeria.

[ReTodd]

Does the chat filter do its job of preventing people from saying offensive things? No, It does not because it sucks ass.

I feel that moderators and screenshots of offenders work much better. I am curious what the in game mods think.

[Megabyte]

Does the chat filter do its job of preventing people from saying offensive things? No, It does not because it sucks ass.

I feel that moderators and screenshots of offenders work much better. I am curious what the in game mods think.

I can fake a screenshot in about a minute, using nothing but paint.

Screenshots are largely pointless when you get down to it.

[***Duo***]

I can fake a screenshot in about a minute, using nothing but paint.

Screenshots are largely pointless when you get down to it.


YOU can.
Does that mean everyone else can?
No.

I find screenshots very useful.


-Duo

[Megabyte]

Yes, anyone could, with very mild effort and imagination. I'd be amazed if someone said they couldn't, and by amazed I mean accusing you of gross incompetence or lying (in which case I'd say to ignore such a person's screenies anways).


Besides which, the point was that asking a mod to take a community member's word SOLELY because of a screenshot was kinda dumb.

If TAO could actually ahve some sort of integrated screenie or recording system outside of the average community member's access (i.e. tamper proof)...THEN i'd think more of it. Not that I can think of any applicable way to do such a thing, but just saying ;)

[bugreporter]

After some consideration:

I meant to bring up an issue on censorship that actually required some thought, but instead I seem to have triggered this rabid defense of cheating.

So fuck you all (and yes, Megabyte, "fuck" IS an autoboot). Here are some parting thoughts:


•This is a suggestion forum. FYI, it is for suggestions. Just because mods haven't and won't (perhaps not immediately) do shit about the hundreds of suggestions of this forum doesn't mean some aren't worth suggesting. So fuck you for using this as a dodge!

•My suggestion wouldn't make things easier for "idiots" (in which people on this forum probably lump together players who's first language isn't English. Real suave, fuckwads!). "idiots" would still fall for f5. My suggestion would make things harder for cheaters (yes, that's many if not all of you in this thread!) who are now robbed of a way to dupe reasonable players (again, if flag were a censored word, on what basis are players to expect it? not like anyone here is listening to reason). No, it shouldn't be easy to cheat. Tough shit!

•It seems monkus might have even been the one I saw use this tactic. So when he says "trust no one," he really means "don't trust me, because I will cheat." if this is so, fuck you! and fuck you for posting!

•To the idiot that said "just say you're from Africa." GUESS WHAT, SHIT-FOR-BRAINS? That's discrimination. But maybe you don't believe in discrimination, in which case I've got news for you: fuck you!

•God, you kids are so stupid. You can't live your life inside of Lord of the Flies. Some day you have to wake up, grow some cajones, and join civilization. But until then, yeah, trust no one, cheat to win!

Oh, and

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck you! (<-not even an autoboot?)


Thanks for reading!

[Megabyte]

No point in helping a fool.


and bug man, its a game

grow up and relax a bit, eh?

[monkus]

•It seems monkus might have even been the one I saw use this tactic. So when he says "trust no one," he really means "don't trust me, because I will cheat." if this is so, fuck you! and fuck you for posting!

Me using that tactic? Not to sound arrogant, but if I got up to 1860, chances are I didn't do it by convincing 1400 players to press F5. I believe in beating people through skill. Convincing them to press a button to make me win would defeat the purpose of playing this game.

I tell people to trust no one simply because some can't be trusted and it's hard to distinguish. You can trust a moderator, and you can trust most experienced users to do the right thing. Sorry if it came out wrong.

[mushroom_girl]

I love this guy. He's a walking contradiction.

Keep on cursing. See where it gets you.

[bugreporter]

mushroom girl: you wouldn't know a contradiction if it bit off your left nut.

megabyte: i think you hit the nail on the head.

monkus: for what it's worth, i apologize. it was obviously a gold on a gray account, and the same gray was later referred to as "monk" by another player. anyway, the original point was about the filter, not about the ethics of in-game chat. another way of putting it is that if you can't trust a filter, then you "ought" to remain silent during the entire game because, yes, you can't trust your opponent to use words that you do not know are on the filter against you (but the fact that you can't trust your opponent is NOT why I think niger should be changed. refer to earlier posts for reasoning).

[uniquinous]

Actually 2 nights ago I just decided to set down and see who jumped me. Despite using my mod set and typing in green the noob told me to push F5....

bugreport: what exactly is your purpose posting in this forum? Do you feel your recent immaturity, baseless accusations, and cursing aids you in any way/shape/form regarding that purpose?

[mushroom_girl]

mushroom girl: you wouldn't know a contradiction if it bit off your left nut.
Well...first I'd be trying to figure out how that's possible.

Because I kinda have ovaries.

[Jeffery]

Well...first I'd be trying to figure out how that's possible.

Because I kinda have ovaries.
PSST- That is exactly what he is talking about. ;)

[mushroom_girl]

...:confused:

I don't have nuts. At least not last time I checked.

[Jeffery]

Lets look at the facts:

1) You don;t have nuts
2) One of your nuts will be bit off
3) It would be a contradiction for it to bite off what you do not have.

Hence, you would NOT know a contradiction if it bit off your left nut.

[mushroom_girl]

But...I caught that. Sorta...

Go bite off an ovary. :dry:

[Jeffery]

Biting an ovary would not be contradictory, now would it?

[mushroom_girl]

For a male it would be.

Haha, gotcha there! ;)

[Jeffery]

Except you're not a male. You're a herme.

[mushroom_girl]

Except you're not a male. You're a herme.
:eek:

I said for you to go bite off your ovary. Not me.

And calling me names isn't going to make things better, Jeffy.

[Jeffery]

Ypu said "an" ovary, not mine specifically. And since you're the only partial female here.....

[uniquinous]

*bites PortoBella*

[mushroom_girl]

Ypu said "an" ovary, not mine specifically. And since you're the only partial female here.....
Don't be jealous because you're operation didn't work out so well.

[bugreporter]

bugreport: what exactly is your purpose posting in this forum? Do you feel your recent immaturity, baseless accusations, and cursing aids you in any way/shape/form regarding that purpose?

*bites PortoBella*

okay, let me know when you want to take a serious point seriously, and then i'll let you know what my purpose was. also, feel free to look up the word "baseless," when you have a chance.

the mods i have seen in this game haven't accomplished anything a good bot wouldn't do, but for what it's worth, i appreciate your volunteering for that shit job.

[Kreator]

Was it really necessary to make an acocunt dedicated to ONLY reporting bugs? I mean, there is no point in making an account that's only dedicated to the reportion of bugs. If you want to report a bug,there is no need to make an account dedicated to that an only that. This may be the wrong place to ask this,but I want an answer to why someone would go so far to make an account just so they can report bugs.

[Megabyte]

Was it really necessary to make an acocunt dedicated to ONLY reporting bugs? I mean, there is no point in making an account that's only dedicated to the reportion of bugs. If you want to report a bug,there is no need to make an account dedicated to that an only that. This may be the wrong place to ask this,but I want an answer to why someone would go so far to make an account just so they can report bugs.


there's a strong possibility it was the only account he made, and for the sole purpose of posting bugs/suggestions


whihc would sorta rend some credence to the name, no?