View Full Version : Server Reorganization
After playing on the various servers lately one thing is clear,
Banff has only 5 or 6 people on at a time,
and Army has about a floor or less, while GL has 2 floors or decent activity.
The amount of people playing tao since the start of 4 servers has decreased significantly, and it doesn't seem like there are enough players to support this many servers.
My suggestion is to cut down the amount of servers to 2, and have the gold server.
Then each player can move there golds to one of the two servers.
Whatever is done It is clear we have more servers then active players for them, changing names, changing the default server, isnt going to bring more players, it will just distribute them differently.
I have a gold on banff atm, and its nearly impossible to find any games. Is there really any justification for having the 3 normal servers when only 1 is active, and 1 semi-alive?
Only other suggestion would be to advertise the game more to bring in more players.
~S3RO
ambienteternity
12-19-2008, 06:16 PM
It sounds like a good idea. It really isn't all that fair that Banff gold members are facing a lack of activity.
Back in 04 when I only played in FPS(before my broke ass found legends), I played on Banff. I just came back over(less broke ^^) thanks to the recent legends drama trying to decide what server to make a new account on. I checked over the boards here to see which one i though would suit me best and heard that Banff has become almost dead. That was a major deterrent. I made my new account on GL since there'd be more opportunities for games.
Hatchet Klown
12-19-2008, 06:37 PM
Reasonable suggestion to help, I'll talk to Serg about the realistic nature of it happening.
Hasn't this been suggested before?
The Anti
12-19-2008, 07:52 PM
Hasn't this been suggested before?
There's been a few things similar to this suggested before. I like the idea though.
Baseballboy
12-19-2008, 08:31 PM
Hasn't this been suggested before?
bluds made a thread talking about it.
Loopget
12-19-2008, 09:05 PM
I love this suggestion but i think i would prefer bludz suggestion because its all about server competition
banff players will defend banff with just about anything they have,
no one cares about army
and GL has enough players as it is, they dont need more >.<
plus i highly doubt banff+GL would go to well
Good suggestion.
Look at legends, while it isn't booming as it used to be, there's always 2 full floors for sure, and the players on the rest of the other floors add up to 1-2 more floors worth of people playing. Plus lobby always has a good chunk of people. Maximize the competition, maximize the fun, and you maximize the activity. and maximize the $$$ for the big guys.
Tree Hugger
12-19-2008, 09:42 PM
go A-99
but tao will eventually die, upgrade to keep the game alive ^^
booyaka619
12-19-2008, 09:45 PM
Good suggestion. I like the idea. It would lose a server but make the other two more playable. No sense in having 3 low populated servers. 2 Higher populated is better.
Hatchet Klown
12-19-2008, 09:47 PM
Serg has personally noticed the population issue on Banff before, so I don't think he'd be against this (personal opinion, not fact).... I just don't know if he needs approval from Bills.
Loopget
12-20-2008, 12:23 AM
stupid bills, holding back our updates :(
Lieutenant
12-20-2008, 08:30 AM
I love this suggestion but i think i would prefer bludz suggestion because its all about server competition
banff players will defend banff with just about anything they have,
no one cares about army
and GL has enough players as it is, they dont need more >.<
plus i highly doubt banff+GL would go to well
If they really wanted to defend Banff they wouldn't say a load of crap here. They would actually go to Banff and pay an account there, and make sure something like this is avoid. Although I do not think this would happen , if this actually occured, Banff members would have to go by the fact that Banff is no longer a visited server anymore.
go A-99
but tao will eventually die, upgrade to keep the game alive ^^
How wrong and right you are. The sole fact of having an upgrade in TAO would bring a lot more folks to play TAO. And I assure you that. Not to mention competition would go pretty high for a good time if this was established. It would have to be soon just how long this would endure.
Nevertheless, I've read dozens of suggestions like this, what makes this special? Unless serg really posted here, or actually read it, nothing's really going to happen.
That's like assuming Bills is going to come tomorrow and throw his money into TAO just so we all have fun.
The Butcher
12-20-2008, 08:42 AM
Seed has nothing to do with this game anymore Lieu, he sold the rights to Bills.
I think..
Lieutenant
12-20-2008, 08:46 AM
Seed has nothing to do with this game anymore Lieu, he sold the rights to Bills.
I think..
Didn't know that, sorry. Either way, you get the point. :p
The Butcher
12-20-2008, 08:47 AM
To me the point is,
Nothing is going to change in this game. In the beginning when the admins were active, things changed. Now they arent, and they wont.
And I'm fine with that, the game is fine how it is. If people get bored, so be it. They can leave.
/shrugs
Baseballboy
12-20-2008, 08:47 AM
Nevertheless, I've read dozens of suggestions like this, what makes this special? Unless serg really posted here, or actually read it, nothing's really going to happen.
That's like assuming Bills and Seed are going to come tomorrow and throw their money into TAO just so we all have fun.
1) Serg won't read this thread, you're right, but thats why we have moderators tha can contact him.
2) Seed does not own FPS.
The Butcher
12-20-2008, 08:48 AM
1) Serg won't read this thread, you're right, but thats why we have moderators tha can contact him.
2) Seed does not own FPS.
/late :rolleyes:
Baseballboy
12-20-2008, 08:49 AM
/late :rolleyes:
i know! </3
S/S of me on banff now : p
http://i44.tinypic.com/1tv7ds.jpg
elimination
12-21-2008, 08:55 AM
Good idea......
Except I do recall last time the admins messedw ith the servers to *update or w.e they were doing, moving them to a better server thingy I think* there was a huge mess of golds gettin canceled and such.
If you delete 1 server, would that mean the golds on it get deleted if so than I would really bet that their would be an angry mob here. ;)
Would it delete the golds or just get moved to another server?
Btw GL= good army= alright banff= no one cares otherwise it wouldn't be so dang dead.
:)
Shiznit
12-21-2008, 12:57 PM
Yeah, it sucks. But it's realistic.
If this does happen, I won't object. I'll probably move my gold to GL.
http://www.iamspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/beer-glass.jpg
To Banff
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.