Warrior (aka belmont)

[bloodreign]

This simple little diddy i call belmont...for simple reasons...

... this is a great warrior who hunts evil wherever it may be found... he carries a flail with a spikey ball at the end of it. He does not block very well but he blocks what he can.. he also wears light armor.

HP: 44
POWER: 20
ARMOR: 8%
BLOCKING: 55%
MOVEMENT: 3
RECOVERY: 1
RANGE: 2 (+ DIAGONAL SHOT)


basicaly this unit has some versatility, but works best killing opponents in a fray.. say behind some of your own units.. or if the opportunity arises he can hit some soft units trying to be protected..

Realy some may say he is to weak to get to kill cleric...(exacty) even with diagonal shot he will find it hard to infiltrate opponents form to deliver the hurtin on a cleric.... (back the smack up with a barrier ward and he may have a chance.) still an oportunity may arise... he would probably work well when an opponent is deep in your form and you need to get some crucial hits on a surrounded unit...usualy a scout may get some decent back shots on a knight.. this unit does that with a little more shootzpa.

Seems kinda weak on it's own but it can hang with most units... spellcasters are breezy 1 on 1 but any mele fighter it will be a hard won battle (if capable at all!):cool:

not gonna revolutionize the game with this unit...but might add some spice to it.....ok maybe a garnish....

[Niamh]

I don't like the diagonal shots.. Although, I think the unit is good overall. Blocking is quite high, sounds similar to a knight with a slight diagonal twist :/

[HierophantNexus]

I think it it is a good addition to the melee group of his CAU creations.

[burnout-278]

im guessing u got belmont from castlevania?

the diagonal shot is needed otherwise this unit would just be a weak knight

but i need a clarification lets say u had a unit like this CKB
the c is a cleric the k is a knight and the b is ur unit, would ur unit be able to hit the knight?

i like the general idea actually, this unit would be able to take down a lot of enemies since it can easily hit a back shot. an assassin would be wrecked but a knight would win but it would be close

[Lord Ash]

it leans a little toward being overpowered, but not too much so. a bit less HP and Armor IMO would do it well. for the most part, I find it really nice, just a bit strong.

[bloodreign]

to answer your question burnout... you would not be able to hit the cleric (through) the knight (CKB),the attack stops at the first unit it hits.
so it is not able to pull off a beast rider double hit.. no no.

perhaps 8% armor and 45% blocking? it's kinda leaning toward berserkerness then...lol.

[Niamh]

So it has a diagonal Line of Sight?

[bloodreign]

that is correct sir.

[Lord Ash]

8 armor and 42-44 HP, leave the blocking as is.

[burnout-278]

actually the original stats are fine, its not overpowered at all

[bloodreign]

I have to agree with Lord Ash here, 8 armor and 42-44 hp is prime....perhaps 44 hp just to make it slightly more beefier than a scout so that 2 knight hits won't spell death for this guy and that after a heal from those 2 knight hits he will be able to withstand a pyro flamejob. :eek:

42 would mean that the warrior would after 2 knight hits (heal ) and a pyro flame job would kill him 2+12 =14 pyro flame =14 death.

[Niamh]

Yea that sounds cool :P

(P.S. Ma'am, Not Sir, Just for reference)

[Lord Ash]

very nice!

it is soo hard to not make units too strong. I go over the line a lot myself. I kinda break things into "classes". is it a fighter, is it a mage, etc. Then try to use rough guidelines from there.

This guy has a little bit of range, and he can attack diagonally, which not much but the scout can do. If he is much beefier, I fear he would compete with knights. As is, he surpasses the Beast Rider in survivability, and damage. I would love to play this guy in game.

good job bud.