PDA

View Full Version : Behemoth


someone
02-18-2004, 03:15 PM
Behemoth

Hp:50
Attack:20
Movement:3
Blocking:50
Armor:25
Recovery:3(2 if attack 1 if just move)

Special Ablities:

Pounds on chest to put it into a rage reducing armor and blocking to 0 and recovery -1 and incresing attack by 15

Let me know what you think now

Kos-Mos
02-18-2004, 03:18 PM
slight over PWR but its koo i tink

ArcPaladinZero
02-18-2004, 04:16 PM
Seems like an underpowered knight, but with the special abilities I guess it balances it out.

blade of souls
02-18-2004, 07:32 PM
little confusing but not bad at all

plusminus
02-18-2004, 08:49 PM
What ArcPaladinZero said.

Special #1 is the much better one though. Otherwise... it's still like an underpowered knight.

max2k106
02-18-2004, 10:03 PM
i think it would be a great unit

someone
02-19-2004, 06:57 AM
could you please give me stats to change rather saying its over or under powered otherwise im left randomly guessing....

someone
02-22-2004, 11:13 AM
lets get a little bump here

Omega_Paladin
02-22-2004, 11:25 AM
I don't like the special abilities. First one is over-powered and second one is under-powered.

Lord Wevilspore
02-22-2004, 03:09 PM
For #2, increase the Power bonus to 15, other than that I think #2 is more economical for the programmers. Suggestion 1 would require tinkering with the existing units. This one would be contained within the unit.

moosey2
02-22-2004, 07:57 PM
I love the idea but I think you should choose one special abilty and not two. Besides that it kicks anus :D

someone
02-23-2004, 08:20 PM
okay i see lord's point and because we would also have to make the cleric invul to it(because then it would only heal 6) i have decided to remove first and tweak around with the second

moosey2
02-24-2004, 08:31 AM
I love it :D i give it a ten ><

Lord Wevilspore
02-24-2004, 08:47 AM
I take it that the special ability is a Concentration ability (click and hold unit to activate ala Mud Golem).
If that is the case, would Concentrating again calm its rage (resets the stats back to normal)?

moosey2
02-24-2004, 09:03 AM
i would think so..

someone
02-24-2004, 02:02 PM
of course