Too many unit drops! (with bonus hilarious picture!)

[Sir Vilhelm]

Ok... So here's the thing... my Enchantress/Barrier Ward set-up is fun to play... but only wins 50% of the time. But I dont want to throw out the makings for it...

So what do I get rid of? Take a look at this pic! (http://www.ussedson.com/delete3.jpg)

?? Opinions? I'm thinking I may need to slim down my BW collection, lol...


And, as an added bonus... check out this freaking HILARIOUS picture I found on "College Humor" dot com (http://www.collegehumor.com/?image_id=36076)

[xyxaxyz2]

Assassins (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Assassins) are (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=are) completely (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=completely) useless (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=useless) for (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=for) golds. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=golds ) Take (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Take) them (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=them) all (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=all) out. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=out )

[LondonJack]

I just won my 3rd barrier ward today, and i tried to build 3 and just couldn't do it. 2 wards is excessive in some setups, i would say ditch down to two :)

Edit: grats on your second cleric, about time you got another :)

Edit2: and i don't agree that assassins are completely useless, i was playing a stoned flanking army for a while and it was fun. I can't see having more then 2, but useless they are not.

[Lord Achilles]

You have NOTHING on me, when I was grey...13 barrier wards! Beat that!

[xyxaxyz2]

London: (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=London:) You (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=You) use (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=use) an (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=an) assassin (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=assassin) in (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=in) your (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=your) normal (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=normal) setup? (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=setup )

[LondonJack]

I do on occasion, i stone two scouts and two assassins, can be very effective for hit and run, and flanking. Can be alot of fun.

[xyxaxyz2]

But (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=But) never (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=never) when (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=when) you (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=you) actually (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=actually) care (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=care) about (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=about) winning. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=winning )

[Dark Emperor]

Dump 2 BW's, 2 Enchantress's, and put in your Dragon Tyrant.

[Omega_Paladin]

Dump a Barrier ward and 1 or 2 witches. You can have a crazy set-up of like 5 barrier wards and 5 enchants :). It has been my experience that any more then 2 witches satuates your formation with units really easy to kill. Some people have come up with some really evil formations involving 3/4 witches (after that it is a suicide set-up.)

[Lich]

im a nb i dont know how to win guys or something telllll mee

[Omega_Paladin]

First stop being a whiny noob I am starting to dislike. Then play until you know how to win. It's all practice man.

[LondonJack]

Originally posted by xyxaxyz2
But (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=But) never (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=never) when (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=when) you (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=you) actually (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=actually) care (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=care) about (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=about) winning. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=winning )

When would that be? :D

[Omega_Paladin]

You care about winning whenever you are obessed with stats like a certain person we won't mention, but he hates elitests :D.

[ArcPaladinZero]

Originally posted by Omega_Paladin
You care about winning whenever you are obessed with stats like a certain person we won't mention, but he hates elitests :D.

Wow Omega, who could you ever possibly be talking about, oh yeah Legends is a lie. :D

[Omega_Paladin]

I don't know who I am talking about either :). Yeah, how could anything with the name "Legends" be true :D?

[xyxaxyz2]

My (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=My) ranking (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ranking) is (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=is) 70 (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=70) less (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=less) than (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=than) yours, (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=yours ) Omega, (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Omega ) and (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=and) 100 (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=100) less (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=less) than (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=than) London's. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=London`s )

[Omega_Paladin]

Did me or London ever say either of us really cared about our rating? And I don't think I have 890 and I am sure London doesn't have 920 :D.

[ArcPaladinZero]

I never really cared about rating, wins or any of that. I'm just here to play a game. I don't care who I play, vetern or newb. I see a game with one person on it. I click it and there's a game, who cares. Don't take the rating so seriously. Some people obviously do. Oh well, maybe it's just me.

[xyxaxyz2]

If (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=If) you're (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=you`re) ranking (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ranking) is (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=is) higher (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=higher) than (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=than) mine (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=mine) you (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=you) probably (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=probably) care (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=care) more (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=more) than (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=than) I (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I) do. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=do ) If (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=If) I (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I) played (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=played) more (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=more) instead (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=instead) of (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=of) staying (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=staying) in (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=in) the (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=the) lobby (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lobby) talking (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=talking) my (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=my) ranking (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ranking) would (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=would) be (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=be) much (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=much) higher. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=higher ) :D

[Omega_Paladin]

How the hell does a high rating mean that you are obsessed with it? Maybe there are people that are just really good, like my esteemed clan mates LondonJack and Sir Vilhelm. I know they aren't up tight about their scores, and they both talk and post plenty, yet they're way up there.

[xyxaxyz2]

If (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=If) I (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I) cared (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cared) about (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=about) ranking (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ranking) why (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=why) would (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=would) I (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I) play (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=play) so (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=so) many (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=many) golds? (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=golds )

[Omega_Paladin]

I don't know. You're a masochist?

[ArcPaladinZero]

Xyx is really an elite! Mwa ha ha ha! The secret is out and there is nothing anyone can do. This has nothing to do with the topic of the thread, but does anything ever? HA! :D

[Omega_Paladin]

Xy an elite? I don't know. Hell, he probably doesn't even know what he is anymore.

[ArcPaladinZero]

Well I'm not going to pick a fight with anyone. I'm just here to talk to people in the community. About the only time I ever see bashing is when it's coming to or directed towards a noob. Oh well, elite or not, I don't really care. All I care about is what's new in the forum.

[Omega_Paladin]

I think its about time you got shipped off to PWA (Post Whores Anonymous)...oh wait...I'm...uh....nevermind then....

[ArcPaladinZero]

Omega you should most certainly not be talking about who needs to go to PWA... that bad bad dancing banana has made you blind to all your point-filled pointless posting that is correct in making sense of things that have no meaning which is why I agree with your decision. Honestly, I just wanted to post one more time before I get off... anyways... does anyone honestly think this thread will ever get back on the topic? I sure don't. Have a lovely day. :D

[Omega_Paladin]

:D <---- is all I have to say.



But yeah, as far as the topic goes, there probably is too many unit drops. Hell most golds that have been here for more than a month or two have already had to throw units away many times. Really, how many barrier wards do you need? But it is more of an incentive for the newer players and the grays. It wouldn't really be fair to just cut it off and leave them SOL on getting anymore units. I would suggest maybe dropping one or two of the better units now and then but that would more likely lead down the long horrible road of the Legends server. People would eventually end up with like 8 knights and other such nonsense. And you can't very well drop any gold units, as it would defeat a large portion of the push to go gold. Anyway, everything seems to work as is so I don't see a need to change anything.

[xyxaxyz2]

About the only time I ever see bashing is when it's coming to or directed towards a noob.

I (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I) think (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=think) thats (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=thats) a (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=a) problem. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=problem ) We (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=We) should (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=should) be (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=be) welcoming (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=welcoming) newbs (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=newbs) and (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=and) bashing (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bashing) people (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=people) like (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=like) us. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=us ) I'm (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I`m) not (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=not) an (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=an) elitist, (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=elitist ) BTW. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=BTW )

[S_K_O_F]

you know what would be really annoying

if someone jumped in the game with 9 barrier wards and 1 cleric

or even worse ...9 barriers and a stone golem

it would take a lifetime to kill all those

[Omega_Paladin]

Yeah but it would be pointless since the jumper would have no way to kill or freeze your units. It would be annoying as a mofo to be sure but really just a matter of time. On another note, Xy, when everyone else gets back to the topic, please come with. Stop plugging you "I'm not elitest" line. We heard you the first hundred times. :D Its just fun to keep poking you and watching to jump.

[xyxaxyz2]

If (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=If) it (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=it) is (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=is) fun (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fun) poking (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=poking) me (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=me) and (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=and) watching (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=watching) me (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=me) jump, (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=jump ) don't (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=don`t) you (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=you) want (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=want) me (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=me) to (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=to) respond (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=respond) as (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=as) I (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I) did? (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=did )

[Omega_Paladin]

No because thats already boring. We're in the process of developing new and innovative ways to poke you. We are utilizing all advances in modern technology to glean ever more enjoyment out of hearing you babble on about things that only make sense to you, a monkey, and that crazy guy down by the I-90 overpass. :D

[xyxaxyz2]

I (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I) don't (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=don`t) want (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=want) to (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=to) reward (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=reward) bad (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bad) work. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=work ) If (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=If) you (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=you) do (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=do) it (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=it) well (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=well) enough (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=enough) I'll (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=I`ll) respond (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=respond) correctly. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=correctly ) Otherwise (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Otherwise) everything'll (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=everything`ll) be (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=be) boring. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=boring )

[Omega_Paladin]

I just saw this in you're sig.

What is elitism, the first of the Three Great Evils? Click here to learn.

Xy, you have got to let this go. Even Green stopped posting that BADGERBADGERBADGER stuff. This is really just not healthy.


I knew we shouldn't have given you that dictionary with half the pages missing from it for your birthday. But we never thought you would learn to read, what with the lobotomy and everything...

[-=Demontamer=-]

Ok im refering to the first thing well you should throw away those barrier wards.....

[Omega_Paladin]

I liked Sir Vilhelms 5 enchantress 4 barrier ward and a beast rider combo. Didn't work half the time, according to him, but it was funny.